tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8448885095667982281.post9196712903240673260..comments2009-07-13T15:29:35.418+02:00Ramone666http://www.blogger.com/profile/08399648428256486747forthesakeofthesong@gmail.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8448885095667982281.post-21933652063015980632009-07-13T15:29:35.418+02:002009-07-13T15:29:35.418+02:00Wist ik (maar niet van die rechtzaak).Maar ja, te laat, want druk in de tuin en zo, hè?De Rikkerthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14893651655362457510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8448885095667982281.post-48072249239263333442009-07-07T21:48:07.994+02:002009-07-07T21:48:07.994+02:00Chris, you´re the winner of the Crossroads award. Thanks for playing. And remember that the Stones (bless ´em) had Prodigal Son copyrighted as a Jagger/Richards composition until a lawsuit came along.Ramone666http://www.blogger.com/profile/08399648428256486747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8448885095667982281.post-36779907887373306172009-07-07T20:56:22.548+02:002009-07-07T20:56:22.548+02:00That would be the Rolling Stones, although it's not quite the same song. When Robert Wilkins gave up secular music and became the Rev. Robert Wilkins, he recast it himself as Prodigal Son.chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12314503574035592432noreply@blogger.com